Talk:Blaster's Wrath: Accuracy/Damage: Difference between revisions
imported>Thirty7 (historical) (Created page with "== Template? == This page was created as an intentional WIP for what an ATO page could look like. Feel free to alter any aspect of it including the templates that were created f...") |
imported>Sekoia (historical) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
At any rate, here it is... mess with it as you like. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 04:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | At any rate, here it is... mess with it as you like. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 04:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
: Looks generally good to me so far, though hard to say until the effects are fleshed out. Are we going to have a separate article for "Blaster's Wrath: Accuracy/Damage (Superior)"? This article needs to either encompass both or reference it, especially since the two enhancements are mutually exclusive. The Superior version will also need a different block of text since they can't be sold on the market and have other restrictions. Also, this is not an Invention enhancement and should not be categorized as such as that is misleading. The category system may need some reworking to accommodate these. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 18:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:26, 20 March 2012
Template?
This page was created as an intentional WIP for what an ATO page could look like. Feel free to alter any aspect of it including the templates that were created for it and the category used. I would glady begin adapting this format for use on other ATO pages, but don't really want to do so until some (any) amount of consensus is reached on the formatting. I would be making this suggestion on the forums, but it seems like there are some cases in which that causes a ridiculous amount of wait time after a consensus seems to be reached until implimentation... perhaps because so many people get involved no one wants to step on toes when they decide to do it?
At any rate, here it is... mess with it as you like. —Thirty7 
04:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- Looks generally good to me so far, though hard to say until the effects are fleshed out. Are we going to have a separate article for "Blaster's Wrath: Accuracy/Damage (Superior)"? This article needs to either encompass both or reference it, especially since the two enhancements are mutually exclusive. The Superior version will also need a different block of text since they can't be sold on the market and have other restrictions. Also, this is not an Invention enhancement and should not be categorized as such as that is misleading. The category system may need some reworking to accommodate these. -- Sekoia 18:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)