Talk:City Info Terminal: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Warriorpoet (historical) (Fansites permitted?) |
imported>Sekoia (historical) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Correct me if I'm wrong, I thought PW policy was that fan sites were not to have their own pages. -- [[User:Sapph|Sapph]] 19:04, 9 July 2007 (EDT) | Correct me if I'm wrong, I thought PW policy was that fan sites were not to have their own pages. -- [[User:Sapph|Sapph]] 19:04, 9 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
They're not supposed to have articles in the main article namespace, that's for sure. They're allowed to be linked to from [[Paragon Wiki:Community Portal]] (which CIT already is), though. CIT also happens to be linked to from the Utilities box in the left column of the wiki, as well as from the vast majority of the badge pages. I appreciate the resource, but I don't see how they merit an exception to the rule, and I think Paragon Wiki already does a very good job of making the community aware of the resource. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 00:23, 10 July 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 04:23, 10 July 2007
What is this page for? - Snorii 06:36, 22 March 2007 (PDT)
Correct me if I'm wrong, I thought PW policy was that fan sites were not to have their own pages. -- Sapph 19:04, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
They're not supposed to have articles in the main article namespace, that's for sure. They're allowed to be linked to from Paragon Wiki:Community Portal (which CIT already is), though. CIT also happens to be linked to from the Utilities box in the left column of the wiki, as well as from the vast majority of the badge pages. I appreciate the resource, but I don't see how they merit an exception to the rule, and I think Paragon Wiki already does a very good job of making the community aware of the resource. -- Sekoia 00:23, 10 July 2007 (EDT)