Talk:Drop Rate: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thirty7 (historical) No edit summary |
imported>Thirty7 (historical) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::That's what I figured... but how is that comment different from the one above it referring to component drop rates? What am I missing here, doesn't seem necessary to mention that at all. {{User:Thirty7/Sig}} 05:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC) | ::That's what I figured... but how is that comment different from the one above it referring to component drop rates? What am I missing here, doesn't seem necessary to mention that at all. {{User:Thirty7/Sig}} 05:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::Yeah, that's true. I guess Leandro didn't notice that line when he added the Incarnate Component line to the list. I'd say the line about the specific trials should go. {{small|— [[File:Blondeshell Sig.png|20px|link=User:Blondeshell]] [[User_talk:Blondeshell|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/Blondeshell|contribs]]}} 20:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::Consider it gone. {{User:Thirty7/Sig}} 21:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:28, 26 July 2012
Wording
Why are only BAF and Lambda listed here? It doesn't seem clear to me what exactly is trying to be stated... especially since Incarnate Component rates are listed above. User:Thirty7/Sig 02:04, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure it's just because those were the only two I-Trials released at the time this page was created. Not much has been done with it since then. —
talk / contribs 03:42, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- That's what I figured... but how is that comment different from the one above it referring to component drop rates? What am I missing here, doesn't seem necessary to mention that at all. User:Thirty7/Sig 05:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
- Consider it gone. User:Thirty7/Sig 21:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)