Talk:Free Player: Difference between revisions
imported>Sekoia (historical) (Created page with "== Features Accessible == I question whether we should be listing everything that we currently list under "Features Accessible". The only part of that relevant to Free Players is...") |
imported>Sekoia (historical) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Features Accessible == | == Features Accessible == | ||
I question whether we should be listing everything that we currently list under "Features Accessible". The only part of that relevant to Free Players is the subsection "For Free". The bulk of this article is identical to [[Premium Player]] (which is why Agge just updated it to transclude from it). The VIP article also has some substantial overlap. Instead of having three articles that go at length on the same material, perhaps it would be better to have a single main account that discusses accounts. Then each of the other three articles could be abbreviated down to a simple definition article that points to the main article for further information (or could even just redirect to the main article). Problem is, what do we call the main article? "Account"? "Subscription"? -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 08:59, 18 December 2011 (UTC) | I question whether we should be listing everything that we currently list under "Features Accessible". The only part of that relevant to Free Players is the subsection "For Free". The bulk of this article is identical to [[Premium Player]] (which is why Agge just updated it to transclude from it). The VIP article also has some substantial overlap. Instead of having three articles that go at length on the same material, perhaps it would be better to have a single main account that discusses accounts. Then each of the other three articles could be abbreviated down to a simple definition article that points to the main article for further information (or could even just redirect to the main article). Problem is, what do we call the main article? "Account"? "Subscription"? -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 08:59, 18 December 2011 (UTC) Addendum: In the NCsoft account management website, these are referred to as "Account Type". So "Account" seems the appropriate term. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 11:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:31, 18 December 2011
Features Accessible
I question whether we should be listing everything that we currently list under "Features Accessible". The only part of that relevant to Free Players is the subsection "For Free". The bulk of this article is identical to Premium Player (which is why Agge just updated it to transclude from it). The VIP article also has some substantial overlap. Instead of having three articles that go at length on the same material, perhaps it would be better to have a single main account that discusses accounts. Then each of the other three articles could be abbreviated down to a simple definition article that points to the main article for further information (or could even just redirect to the main article). Problem is, what do we call the main article? "Account"? "Subscription"? -- Sekoia 08:59, 18 December 2011 (UTC) Addendum: In the NCsoft account management website, these are referred to as "Account Type". So "Account" seems the appropriate term. -- Sekoia 11:31, 18 December 2011 (UTC)