Talk:Man in Black Badge: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sister Leortha (historical) No edit summary |
imported>StarGeek (historical) m (→Defeat count: Added Sig for TayJk) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
and maybe | and maybe | ||
:[[Widower Badge]]/[[Widow Badge]] (Need to verify this last when I get a chance) | :[[Widower Badge]]/[[Widow Badge]] <s>(Need to verify this last when I get a chance)</s> Verified. This change is in there. | ||
We need a descision on how to handle these here consistently. Currently Handsome/Beautiful have their own separate pages, while there is no separate Woman in Black page. Do we want to make up separate pages for all these varient names, or just redirects and mention them in the page themselves. I'm inclined to do the latter, as I don't see full new pages for the slight difference in names being all that useful. - [[User:Sister Leortha|Sister Leortha]] 10:19, 27 June 2006 (PDT) | We need a descision on how to handle these here consistently. Currently Handsome/Beautiful have their own separate pages, while there is no separate Woman in Black page. Do we want to make up separate pages for all these varient names, or just redirects and mention them in the page themselves. I'm inclined to do the latter, as I don't see full new pages for the slight difference in names being all that useful. - [[User:Sister Leortha|Sister Leortha]] 10:19, 27 June 2006 (PDT) | ||
:Redirect pages sound fine to me. - [[User:Snorii|Snorii]] 10:50, 27 June 2006 (PDT) | |||
:: Agreed --[[User:StarGeek|StarGeek]] 12:52, 27 June 2006 (PDT) | |||
::: I third it @.@, rediect would be best. o_o I don't like all those name changes though.. weathergirl? >.< and wiseguy specifically referse to old gangster slang, making it wisegal sounds bad. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 18:47, 27 June 2006 (PDT) | |||
:::: Sounds good to me. I could go either way, but I don't want to mess up a good consensus. http://pcfreepress.com/forums/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif --[[User:TonyV|TonyV]] 20:12, 27 June 2006 (PDT) | |||
== Defeat count == | |||
According to the Achievement page you need to kill 100 Shivans for this badge. According the the page itself, you need to kill 200. Which is it? - [[User:TayJK|TayJK]] | |||
: Good question. CIT says 200, Badge-Hunter says 100. {{User:StarGeek/sig}} 14:51, 5 December 2006 (PST) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:08, 5 December 2006
Lastest patch introduced a number of new gender-specific badges. Previously we had:
Now we add:
- Ironman Badge/Ironwoman Badge
- Mr. Big Badge/Ms. Big Badge
- Wiseguy Badge/Wisegal Badge
- Weatherman Badge/Weathergirl Badge
- Medicine Man Badge/Medicine Woman Badge
and maybe
- Widower Badge/Widow Badge
(Need to verify this last when I get a chance)Verified. This change is in there.
We need a descision on how to handle these here consistently. Currently Handsome/Beautiful have their own separate pages, while there is no separate Woman in Black page. Do we want to make up separate pages for all these varient names, or just redirects and mention them in the page themselves. I'm inclined to do the latter, as I don't see full new pages for the slight difference in names being all that useful. - Sister Leortha 10:19, 27 June 2006 (PDT)
- Redirect pages sound fine to me. - Snorii 10:50, 27 June 2006 (PDT)
- Agreed --StarGeek 12:52, 27 June 2006 (PDT)
- I third it @.@, rediect would be best. o_o I don't like all those name changes though.. weathergirl? >.< and wiseguy specifically referse to old gangster slang, making it wisegal sounds bad. --Sleepy Kitty 18:47, 27 June 2006 (PDT)
- Sounds good to me. I could go either way, but I don't want to mess up a good consensus. http://pcfreepress.com/forums/images/smiles/icon_wink.gif --TonyV 20:12, 27 June 2006 (PDT)
Defeat count
According to the Achievement page you need to kill 100 Shivans for this badge. According the the page itself, you need to kill 200. Which is it? - TayJK
- Good question. CIT says 200, Badge-Hunter says 100. User:StarGeek/sig 14:51, 5 December 2006 (PST)