Talk:Origin Powers: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sleepykitty (historical) No edit summary |
imported>Rex-4D44 (historical) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: -.- have to agree, these should be inherent now, but the game still lists them.. the GMs don't think they'll be moved over anytime soon, I /buged and /petitioned them yesterday --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 10:01, 7 June 2006 (PDT) | :: -.- have to agree, these should be inherent now, but the game still lists them.. the GMs don't think they'll be moved over anytime soon, I /buged and /petitioned them yesterday --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 10:01, 7 June 2006 (PDT) | ||
:: We should organize and petitioned them for this. However, if they were listed as inherent, does that mean they get enhancements? ([[User:Rex-4D44|Rex-4D44]] 09:54, 23 April 2007 (PDT)) | |||
Revision as of 16:54, 23 April 2007
On second thought...
These powers still appear in the Temporary Powers section of the Powers tab. Anyone think that maybe they should stay with the Temporary Powers page? --StarGeek 15:57, 6 June 2006 (PDT)
- I see what you mean. No, they should no longer be listed as Temporary Powers, IMHO. --TonyV 16:26, 6 June 2006 (PDT)
- -.- have to agree, these should be inherent now, but the game still lists them.. the GMs don't think they'll be moved over anytime soon, I /buged and /petitioned them yesterday --Sleepy Kitty 10:01, 7 June 2006 (PDT)
- We should organize and petitioned them for this. However, if they were listed as inherent, does that mean they get enhancements? (Rex-4D44 09:54, 23 April 2007 (PDT))