Talk:Origin Powers: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>StarGeek (historical) (On second thought...) |
imported>Corebreach (historical) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
These powers still appear in the Temporary Powers section of the Powers tab. Anyone think that maybe they should stay with the [[Temporary Powers]] page? --[[User:StarGeek|StarGeek]] 15:57, 6 June 2006 (PDT) | These powers still appear in the Temporary Powers section of the Powers tab. Anyone think that maybe they should stay with the [[Temporary Powers]] page? --[[User:StarGeek|StarGeek]] 15:57, 6 June 2006 (PDT) | ||
:I see what you mean. No, they should no longer be listed as Temporary Powers, IMHO. --[[User:TonyV|TonyV]] 16:26, 6 June 2006 (PDT) | |||
:: -.- have to agree, these should be inherent now, but the game still lists them.. the GMs don't think they'll be moved over anytime soon, I /buged and /petitioned them yesterday --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 10:01, 7 June 2006 (PDT) | |||
:: We should organize and petitioned them for this. However, if they were listed as inherent, does that mean they get enhancements? ([[User:Rex-4D44|Rex-4D44]] 09:54, 23 April 2007 (PDT)) | |||
::: I think they are left temporary for that reason - no enhancements. Hehe, I could just see (in the [[Old Hamidon Raid]]) hundreds of Heroes with Tasers throwing out holds with 3-slotted +Hold duration SOs... -- [[User:Kalon|Kalon]] 20:36, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | |||
::: Temporary always means unenhanceable, but inherent does not always mean enhanceable. The categories just don't match up cleanly. [[User:Corebreach|Corebreach]] 06:50, 1 August 2007 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:50, 1 August 2007
On second thought...
These powers still appear in the Temporary Powers section of the Powers tab. Anyone think that maybe they should stay with the Temporary Powers page? --StarGeek 15:57, 6 June 2006 (PDT)
- I see what you mean. No, they should no longer be listed as Temporary Powers, IMHO. --TonyV 16:26, 6 June 2006 (PDT)
- -.- have to agree, these should be inherent now, but the game still lists them.. the GMs don't think they'll be moved over anytime soon, I /buged and /petitioned them yesterday --Sleepy Kitty 10:01, 7 June 2006 (PDT)
- We should organize and petitioned them for this. However, if they were listed as inherent, does that mean they get enhancements? (Rex-4D44 09:54, 23 April 2007 (PDT))
- I think they are left temporary for that reason - no enhancements. Hehe, I could just see (in the Old Hamidon Raid) hundreds of Heroes with Tasers throwing out holds with 3-slotted +Hold duration SOs... -- Kalon 20:36, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
- Temporary always means unenhanceable, but inherent does not always mean enhanceable. The categories just don't match up cleanly. Corebreach 06:50, 1 August 2007 (EDT)
- We should organize and petitioned them for this. However, if they were listed as inherent, does that mean they get enhancements? (Rex-4D44 09:54, 23 April 2007 (PDT))