Talk:Patch Notes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Adrey (historical) No edit summary |
imported>Sekoia (historical) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Some links == | |||
* http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4653.html?prod=9 | |||
* http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4603.html | |||
* http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4617.html | |||
* http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4618.html | |||
== Dates == | |||
I'd suggest renaming the individual patch notes pages to Patch Notes/yyyy-mm-dd so they go in order on the Category page. [[User:Adrey|Adrey]] 13:17, 22 September 2007 (EDT) | I'd suggest renaming the individual patch notes pages to Patch Notes/yyyy-mm-dd so they go in order on the Category page. [[User:Adrey|Adrey]] 13:17, 22 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
: I agree with that suggestion. Not only does it let them sort better (which is very nice!), but it's also more clear. (Europe and the US define 1/2/07 different -- is it January 2 or February 1?) YYYY-MM-DD is an ISO standard, too. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 16:12, 23 September 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:12, 23 September 2007
Some links
- http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4653.html?prod=9
- http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4603.html
- http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4617.html
- http://www.plaync.com/us/support/doc_4618.html
Dates
I'd suggest renaming the individual patch notes pages to Patch Notes/yyyy-mm-dd so they go in order on the Category page. Adrey 13:17, 22 September 2007 (EDT)
- I agree with that suggestion. Not only does it let them sort better (which is very nice!), but it's also more clear. (Europe and the US define 1/2/07 different -- is it January 2 or February 1?) YYYY-MM-DD is an ISO standard, too. -- Sekoia 16:12, 23 September 2007 (EDT)