Talk:Visual Guide: Lambda Sector Trial: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Omegashockwave (historical) |
imported>Thirty7 (historical) mNo edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Why would this be created as a seperate page? Why wouldn't all of this information simply be fit into [[Lambda Sector Trial/Strategy]]?? Especially when one considers that a majority of this information is repeated, and what isn't is found in a place that was less obvious (until I linked it from the Lambda page that is) —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 05:29, 5 February 2012 (UTC) | Why would this be created as a seperate page? Why wouldn't all of this information simply be fit into [[Lambda Sector Trial/Strategy]]?? Especially when one considers that a majority of this information is repeated, and what isn't is found in a place that was less obvious (until I linked it from the Lambda page that is) —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 05:29, 5 February 2012 (UTC) | ||
:I did not want to do a massive overhaul of the other writers' pages. This is the first in a series of guides that will focus on the visuals of the incarnate trials. Not all players learn the best from text only and figured the idea was different enough to merit a separate page. I will group together all these guides I'm working on once they are completed. Also, was there a purpose to adding a "Headline Text" section? If so, I'll put it back in, but with nothing there it looks out of place. [[User:Omegashockwave|Omega Shockwave]] 15:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
I did not want to do a massive overhaul of the other writers' pages. This is the first in a series of guides that will focus on the visuals of the incarnate trials. Not all players learn the best from text only and figured the idea was different enough to merit a separate page. | |||
:As a general principle, we have historically been a bit more flexible with things designated as Player Guides than we are with other articles. Different guides may present the same info from different perspectives. As long as it's linked to from the other article, it's probably fine. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 20:25, 5 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
::That makes sense... carry on! {{Smile}} Also, I am not sure where the "Headline Text" came from... maybe it is something that got copied by accident when i put in the playerguide template? —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 07:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:55, 6 February 2012
Purpose
Why would this be created as a seperate page? Why wouldn't all of this information simply be fit into Lambda Sector Trial/Strategy?? Especially when one considers that a majority of this information is repeated, and what isn't is found in a place that was less obvious (until I linked it from the Lambda page that is) —Thirty7 
05:29, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- I did not want to do a massive overhaul of the other writers' pages. This is the first in a series of guides that will focus on the visuals of the incarnate trials. Not all players learn the best from text only and figured the idea was different enough to merit a separate page. I will group together all these guides I'm working on once they are completed. Also, was there a purpose to adding a "Headline Text" section? If so, I'll put it back in, but with nothing there it looks out of place. Omega Shockwave 15:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- As a general principle, we have historically been a bit more flexible with things designated as Player Guides than we are with other articles. Different guides may present the same info from different perspectives. As long as it's linked to from the other article, it's probably fine. -- Sekoia 20:25, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
- That makes sense... carry on!
Also, I am not sure where the "Headline Text" came from... maybe it is something that got copied by accident when i put in the playerguide template? —Thirty7 07:55, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
- That makes sense... carry on!
