Template talk:Enemy Praetorian Guard: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thirty7 (historical) m (fixing user name link) |
imported>Thirty7 (historical) No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Deletion == | == Deletion == | ||
[[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] marked this page for deletion, presumably because it linked to a Disambig page for some reason and nothing actually links to this page. Since, the delete tag was removed and then the template edited to actually link somewhere useful. But, why are we keeping this page exactly if it isn't used anywhere and isn't likely to be in the near future either? {{User:Thirty7/Sig}} 00:52, 3 July 2014 (UTC) | [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] marked this page for deletion, presumably because it linked to a Disambig page for some reason and nothing actually links to this page. Since, the delete tag was removed and then the template edited to actually link somewhere useful. But, why are we keeping this page exactly if it isn't used anywhere and isn't likely to be in the near future either? {{User:Thirty7/Sig}} 00:52, 3 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
: There's discussion on it in [http://www.cohtitan.com/forum/index.php/topic,9552.msg137644.html this thread on the forums]. I'm not really clear on what the outcome is though. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 03:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
:Okay, I get it now. Lot of context in there... When I am on a desktop I will comment further. {{User:Thirty7/Sig}} 05:32, 3 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
::Yeah, I edited the page again for a bitter redirect, and in my edit notes I said I still thought it should be marked for deletion... then I went back and read the thread, and remembered that was wrong. The enemy group is used for Battle Maiden's swords or something - and I guess Bobcat in one mission? So it should be kept until we figure out if we're just putting those in the Praetorian (enemy Group) page, or keeping this group for them. [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 16:48, 3 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::If "Praetorian Guard" is used as the group for an enemy in a mission, then we should keep this template to refer to them as such for those missions. That is how it is done in pretty much every case, whether there's a more logical choice or not (spelling errors aside, of course). {{User:Thirty7/Sig}} 22:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:02, 3 July 2014
Deletion
Felderburg marked this page for deletion, presumably because it linked to a Disambig page for some reason and nothing actually links to this page. Since, the delete tag was removed and then the template edited to actually link somewhere useful. But, why are we keeping this page exactly if it isn't used anywhere and isn't likely to be in the near future either? User:Thirty7/Sig 00:52, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- There's discussion on it in this thread on the forums. I'm not really clear on what the outcome is though. -- Sekoia 03:56, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, I get it now. Lot of context in there... When I am on a desktop I will comment further. User:Thirty7/Sig 05:32, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, I edited the page again for a bitter redirect, and in my edit notes I said I still thought it should be marked for deletion... then I went back and read the thread, and remembered that was wrong. The enemy group is used for Battle Maiden's swords or something - and I guess Bobcat in one mission? So it should be kept until we figure out if we're just putting those in the Praetorian (enemy Group) page, or keeping this group for them. Felderburg 16:48, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- If "Praetorian Guard" is used as the group for an enemy in a mission, then we should keep this template to refer to them as such for those missions. That is how it is done in pretty much every case, whether there's a more logical choice or not (spelling errors aside, of course). User:Thirty7/Sig 22:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)