Category talk:Signature Arc Contacts: Difference between revisions

From Homecoming Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Thirty7 (historical)
m (Created page with "== Redundancy == How is this not redundant with Category:SSA Contacts (though to me, yours has a better name), and Category:Who Will Die Contacts? Since WWD Contacts i...")
 
imported>Aggelakis (historical)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Redundancy ==
== Redundancy ==
How is this not redundant with [[:Category:SSA Contacts]] (though to me, yours has a better name), and [[:Category:Who Will Die Contacts]]?  Since WWD Contacts is a subcategory of SSA Contacts.  —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 05:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
How is this not redundant with Category:SSA Contacts (though to me, yours has a better name), and [[:Category:Who Will Die Contacts]]?  Since WWD Contacts is a subcategory of SSA Contacts.  Also, you are missing [[Alastor]].
—[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 05:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 
:Hmm, missed we had an SSA contacts an that organisation... The WIP progress is definitely the case here. And yes, the term "Signature Arc Contacts" is to be preferred (I think) as it matches the one used in the actual game. See also [[Signature Arc Contact]].
 
:.... Okay, I think there is a good case all Signature Arc Contacts to be in the same category. Over time, we will have various volumes of Arcs. Each arc will render episodes at different levels, too. Rather than have folks navigate up and down a category tree, let's ensure all Signature Arc Contacts are in this category. Readers can see all the contacts that they can access at a glance. Obviously, Who Will Die contacts should be in Who Will Die category as well, and volume 2 contacts will be in whatever category that will be.
 
:Maybe keep the SSA Contacts category if that adds an additional useful dimension?
 
:Thoughts? Above just me premise for why I set out to do this. [[User:Taosin|Taosin]] 11:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 
::I think I am confused.  Are we getting rid of SSA Contacts in favor of Signature Arc Contacts?  Or are you saying keep both for some reason?  —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 12:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 
:::I deleted SSA Contacts. Signature Arc Contacts is a more clear name for it. ~ {{:User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 14:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 14:45, 14 January 2012

Redundancy

How is this not redundant with Category:SSA Contacts (though to me, yours has a better name), and Category:Who Will Die Contacts? Since WWD Contacts is a subcategory of SSA Contacts. Also, you are missing Alastor. —Thirty7 Talk-Icon.jpg 05:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, missed we had an SSA contacts an that organisation... The WIP progress is definitely the case here. And yes, the term "Signature Arc Contacts" is to be preferred (I think) as it matches the one used in the actual game. See also Signature Arc Contact.
.... Okay, I think there is a good case all Signature Arc Contacts to be in the same category. Over time, we will have various volumes of Arcs. Each arc will render episodes at different levels, too. Rather than have folks navigate up and down a category tree, let's ensure all Signature Arc Contacts are in this category. Readers can see all the contacts that they can access at a glance. Obviously, Who Will Die contacts should be in Who Will Die category as well, and volume 2 contacts will be in whatever category that will be.
Maybe keep the SSA Contacts category if that adds an additional useful dimension?
Thoughts? Above just me premise for why I set out to do this. Taosin 11:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
I think I am confused. Are we getting rid of SSA Contacts in favor of Signature Arc Contacts? Or are you saying keep both for some reason? —Thirty7 Talk-Icon.jpg 12:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
I deleted SSA Contacts. Signature Arc Contacts is a more clear name for it. ~ User:Aggelakis/Sig1 14:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)