Talk:Arachnos Soldier: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Leandro (historical) m (Talk:Wolf Spider moved to Talk:Arachnos Soldier: We now know this is the real name for the AT.) |
imported>Zeero92 (historical) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
: I agree. :) -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 21:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC) | : I agree. :) -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 21:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Agreed. - [[User:Baalus Seth|Skarmory The PG]] 00:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC) | ::Agreed. - [[User:Baalus Seth|Skarmory The PG]] 00:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
::: I've changed it from Wolf Spider and Blood Widow in the Articles, to being Arachnos Soldier and Arachnos Widow, as I feel it describes it better, Seeing as we now know the official names, and the list of archetypes says that they're Arachnos Soldier and Arachnos Widow anyway. [[User:Zeero92|Zeero92]] 16:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:49, 18 April 2008
Naming issue
I believe we should use Wolf Spider to refer to the AT, and Wolf Spiders to refer to the faction. Similarly, Blood Widow for the AT, Blood Widows for the faction. Thoughts? -- Leandro 20:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- I agree. :) -- Sekoia 21:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. - Skarmory The PG 00:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- I've changed it from Wolf Spider and Blood Widow in the Articles, to being Arachnos Soldier and Arachnos Widow, as I feel it describes it better, Seeing as we now know the official names, and the list of archetypes says that they're Arachnos Soldier and Arachnos Widow anyway. Zeero92 16:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Agreed. - Skarmory The PG 00:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)