Talk:Ascendant-O's: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aggelakis (historical) |
imported>Sekoia (historical) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It seems to me that this page should be protected or something, right? [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 17:30, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | It seems to me that this page should be protected or something, right? [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 17:30, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
:We only protect pages that are having trouble with vandalism/spam. We haven't had a single vandal/spam since City shut down. ~ {{User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 19:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | :We only protect pages that are having trouble with vandalism/spam. We haven't had a single vandal/spam since City shut down. ~ {{User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 19:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
::That's true. I just noticed his virtue verse page (linked here) was protected, so it made sense to me to do the same here. [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 04:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
::: Virtue Verse is a wiki where players upload their own canon/info about their own characters. Unlike PW, articles on VV generally "belong" to the player. It makes sense to lock a player's personal page after they pass. This article is a third-party account of his in-game/canon impact, though, not his personal page. I don't see any reason to lock it. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 17:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:00, 27 June 2013
Protecting this page?
It seems to me that this page should be protected or something, right? Felderburg 17:30, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- We only protect pages that are having trouble with vandalism/spam. We haven't had a single vandal/spam since City shut down. ~ User:Aggelakis/Sig1 19:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- That's true. I just noticed his virtue verse page (linked here) was protected, so it made sense to me to do the same here. Felderburg 04:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- Virtue Verse is a wiki where players upload their own canon/info about their own characters. Unlike PW, articles on VV generally "belong" to the player. It makes sense to lock a player's personal page after they pass. This article is a third-party account of his in-game/canon impact, though, not his personal page. I don't see any reason to lock it. -- Sekoia 17:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- That's true. I just noticed his virtue verse page (linked here) was protected, so it made sense to me to do the same here. Felderburg 04:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC)