Talk:Base Item Origins: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aggelakis (historical) |
imported>Aggelakis (historical) mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Category? == | == Category? == | ||
So this article has the Base Items category - should it also be placed in the general Bases category? It looks like there are a lot of articles about bases that are part of a base subcategory, so I guess that counts, right? It would maybe be silly to put something (in this case) in the Base Items sub category and then also the main Bases category, right? The only issue with this is that in looking at various articles, there's no direct link from base-related stuff to the main article about [[Supergroup | So this article has the Base Items category - should it also be placed in the general Bases category? It looks like there are a lot of articles about bases that are part of a base subcategory, so I guess that counts, right? It would maybe be silly to put something (in this case) in the Base Items sub category and then also the main Bases category, right? The only issue with this is that in looking at various articles, there's no direct link from base-related stuff to the main article about [[Supergroup Base]]s. Shouldn't there be? [[User:Felderburg|Felderburg]] 21:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
:The navbox had a link to [[Supergroup]] [[Supergroup Base|Bases]] in the title field. I changed the title to simply link to [[Supergroup Base]]s and added [[Supergroup]] to the 'general' field. ~ {{User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 03:44, 29 June 2013 (UTC) | :The navbox had a link to <nowiki>[[Supergroup]] [[Supergroup Base|Bases]]</nowiki> in the title field. I changed the title to simply link to [[Supergroup Base]]s and added [[Supergroup]] to the 'general' field. ~ {{User:Aggelakis/Sig1}} 03:44, 29 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:48, 29 June 2013
Category?
So this article has the Base Items category - should it also be placed in the general Bases category? It looks like there are a lot of articles about bases that are part of a base subcategory, so I guess that counts, right? It would maybe be silly to put something (in this case) in the Base Items sub category and then also the main Bases category, right? The only issue with this is that in looking at various articles, there's no direct link from base-related stuff to the main article about Supergroup Bases. Shouldn't there be? Felderburg 21:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
- The navbox had a link to [[Supergroup]] [[Supergroup Base|Bases]] in the title field. I changed the title to simply link to Supergroup Bases and added Supergroup to the 'general' field. ~ User:Aggelakis/Sig1 03:44, 29 June 2013 (UTC)