Talk:Council/Ascendants: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thirty7 (historical) m (→Subpage?: wording edit) |
imported>Thirty7 (historical) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Subpage? == | == Subpage? == | ||
Is there any reason why sub-groups, like these, other Council sub-groups and the various Arachnos sub-groups shouldn't be subpages to the main pages? For example: Council/Ascendants or Arachnos/Fortunatas. The only reason I am suggesting that is so that on the top of each of these pages there would be that "breadcrumb" link back to the main page and it would also be more visually obvious that these groups are connected directly to the main group, and in fact aren't seperate entities at all. Perhaps this would be too little benefit for the work involved, but the thought occurred to me so I figured there was no harm in asking. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 18:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC) | Is there any reason why sub-groups, like these, other Council sub-groups and the various Arachnos sub-groups shouldn't be subpages to the main pages? For example: Council/Ascendants or Arachnos/Fortunatas. The only reason I am suggesting that is so that on the top of each of these pages there would be that "breadcrumb" link back to the main page and it would also be more visually obvious that these groups are connected directly to the main group, and in fact aren't seperate entities at all. Perhaps this would be too little benefit for the work involved, but the thought occurred to me so I figured there was no harm in asking. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 18:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
: Making them subpages makes sense to me. It'd probably be helpful to retain the current article names as redirects. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 22:17, 22 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
::Okay, made Arachnos and Council pages over like this... did I miss any? —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 12:42, 27 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:42, 27 December 2011
Subpage?
Is there any reason why sub-groups, like these, other Council sub-groups and the various Arachnos sub-groups shouldn't be subpages to the main pages? For example: Council/Ascendants or Arachnos/Fortunatas. The only reason I am suggesting that is so that on the top of each of these pages there would be that "breadcrumb" link back to the main page and it would also be more visually obvious that these groups are connected directly to the main group, and in fact aren't seperate entities at all. Perhaps this would be too little benefit for the work involved, but the thought occurred to me so I figured there was no harm in asking. —Thirty7 
18:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Making them subpages makes sense to me. It'd probably be helpful to retain the current article names as redirects. -- Sekoia 22:17, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, made Arachnos and Council pages over like this... did I miss any? —Thirty7 12:42, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, made Arachnos and Council pages over like this... did I miss any? —Thirty7