Talk:Salvage Tiers: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sleepykitty (historical) m (Talk:Base Salvage Tiers moved to Talk:Salvage Tiers: ... there is absolutely no base salvage on this page, thus, it should not be called base salvage tiers.) |
imported>Catwhoorg (historical) (split into low/medium/high) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::@.@ with a name as useless as its current, I get the urge to rename the article to "thingies". I'm guessing the point of the page was to show the tier relationship between some of the items.. but since there are no comments or opening, I can't really be sure. I guess I'll do something with it in a week or so if the author doesn't respond here (not saying I'll delete it, but some fixes, renaming and perhaps an opening..). --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 06:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC) | :::@.@ with a name as useless as its current, I get the urge to rename the article to "thingies". I'm guessing the point of the page was to show the tier relationship between some of the items.. but since there are no comments or opening, I can't really be sure. I guess I'll do something with it in a week or so if the author doesn't respond here (not saying I'll delete it, but some fixes, renaming and perhaps an opening..). --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 06:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
o_o;; well, its a better name than before (now that its corrected) but its still only sorta related as salvage tiers actually refer to the Component Base salvage.. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 00:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
The other thing to do would be to break it out into the low/medium/high level drops, which is useful information. Much like [[Talk:Invention_Salvage#Tech-Arcane_and_Lowbie-Midbie-Highbie_split| the table here]]. [[User:Catwhoorg|Catwhoorg]] 12:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:06, 30 September 2008
o.o so.. what is the intended purpose of this page, and perhaps a better name? --Sleepy Kitty 11:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Salvage 101? :P -- DM Yarrow 19:24, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I suppose the 108 comes from the number of salvage items (2 origins * 3 categories * 3 level ranges * 6 items = 108), but beyond that I've got nothin'. --Eabrace 21:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- @.@ with a name as useless as its current, I get the urge to rename the article to "thingies". I'm guessing the point of the page was to show the tier relationship between some of the items.. but since there are no comments or opening, I can't really be sure. I guess I'll do something with it in a week or so if the author doesn't respond here (not saying I'll delete it, but some fixes, renaming and perhaps an opening..). --Sleepy Kitty 06:41, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
o_o;; well, its a better name than before (now that its corrected) but its still only sorta related as salvage tiers actually refer to the Component Base salvage.. --Sleepy Kitty 00:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
The other thing to do would be to break it out into the low/medium/high level drops, which is useful information. Much like the table here. Catwhoorg 12:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)