Talk:Server Transfer: Difference between revisions

From Homecoming Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Thirty7 (historical)
(+comment)
imported>Taosin (historical)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
Just my two cents, thoughts? [[User:Taosin|Taosin]] 10:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Just my two cents, thoughts? [[User:Taosin|Taosin]] 10:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


:Reading it as it is with the dates updating the "flow" of the item to where it is today, it does ready like a Historical section.  I have to agree with your take on it, Tao.  Alternatively, you could do some heavy editing to remove the "history" feel of the article and simply move some specific comments regarding dates to a Historical section.  I like your version better.  {{User:Thirty7/Sig}} 12:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
:Reading the article as it is now with the all of the dates updating the phases the item has gone through to get it to where it is today, it does read like a Historical section.  I have to agree with your take on it, Tao.  Alternatively, you could do some heavy editing to remove the "history" feel of the article and simply move some specific comments regarding dates to a Historical section.  I like your version better, though.  {{User:Thirty7/Sig}} 12:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 
: I think moving stuff to a Historical section is a great idea. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 19:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 
:: A'right, took a stab at it! Have at it, folks! [[User:Taosin|Taosin]] 07:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:47, 21 June 2012

What else should we cover in here? --Colonel Jasmine 13:41, 30 October 2007 (EDT)

Move lots to Historical?

As I see it, much of the material in Overview and Server Transfer Discounts should be moved to a Historical section? It reads almost definitively as what "Historical" is. It no longer applies to the current game (etc); but can then be found by those interested.

This focuses the main part on what players need to know now.

Mention should be made (perhaps?) that server discounts sometimes occur during weekly sales and so forth, and to keep an eye on the official announcements/news.

Just my two cents, thoughts? Taosin 10:36, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Reading the article as it is now with the all of the dates updating the phases the item has gone through to get it to where it is today, it does read like a Historical section. I have to agree with your take on it, Tao. Alternatively, you could do some heavy editing to remove the "history" feel of the article and simply move some specific comments regarding dates to a Historical section. I like your version better, though. User:Thirty7/Sig 12:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
I think moving stuff to a Historical section is a great idea. -- Sekoia 19:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
A'right, took a stab at it! Have at it, folks! Taosin 07:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)