Talk:Touch of Death: Negative Energy Damage: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Eabrace (historical) m (missing NE chance %) |
imported>Sekoia (historical) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Missing percentage chance for Negative Energy damage. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] 20:22, 12 June 2007 (EDT) | Missing percentage chance for Negative Energy damage. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] 20:22, 12 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
== Citation Request == | |||
I checked the proc percent in Mid's and it matches the 15% Snorii got from the forums. None of our other procs have citations, I see no reason why this one should. If someone wants to ''dispute'' the proc frequency, then by all means, bring it up on the talk page. But putting a citation request on it, without any explanation, seems unnecessary. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 16:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:20, 29 February 2008
Missing percentage chance for Negative Energy damage. --Eabrace 20:22, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
Citation Request
I checked the proc percent in Mid's and it matches the 15% Snorii got from the forums. None of our other procs have citations, I see no reason why this one should. If someone wants to dispute the proc frequency, then by all means, bring it up on the talk page. But putting a citation request on it, without any explanation, seems unnecessary. -- Sekoia 16:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)