Talk:Retroactive Continuity: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ravenswing (historical) No edit summary |
imported>Ravenswing (historical) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Retcons usually have to do with the story, not mechanics of a class of NPCs changing... should this be kept? -- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] ([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]]) 17:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC) | Retcons usually have to do with the story, not mechanics of a class of NPCs changing... should this be kept? -- [[User:Aggelakis|Agge]] ([[User_talk:Aggelakis|talk]]) 17:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
The only actual retcon mentioned there is the Spider to Arachnos one. The 5th Column were taken over by the Council, not retroactively deleted. Indeed, they still exist. I think this page needs a big overhaul. | The only actual retcon mentioned there is the Spider to Arachnos one. The 5th Column were taken over by the Council, not retroactively deleted. Indeed, they still exist. I think this page needs a big overhaul. - [[User:Ravenswing]] | ||
Revision as of 20:10, 14 December 2008
Improved Monstrosities
Retcons usually have to do with the story, not mechanics of a class of NPCs changing... should this be kept? -- Agge (talk) 17:34, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
The only actual retcon mentioned there is the Spider to Arachnos one. The 5th Column were taken over by the Council, not retroactively deleted. Indeed, they still exist. I think this page needs a big overhaul. - User:Ravenswing