Homecoming Wiki talk:Community Portal: Difference between revisions
imported>Warriorpoet (historical) (RFC) |
imported>Warriorpoet (historical) (More RFC) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<.< is it okay to put any links on here? as in, sg ones? | <.< is it okay to put any links on here? as in, sg ones? | ||
== RFC == | |||
I was looking at the edit history, and saw some editing by a fellow fan-site admin that strikes me as fairly petty. I'm going to recuse myself from any changes - either to his sites or mine. I don't want to get dragged down. But if one (or more!) neutral editors could step in, take a look, and make their own decisions, I would appreciate it. The diffs are most easily seen via [[http://paragonwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Paragon_Wiki%3ACommunity_Portal&diff=24305&oldid=22342]] | I was looking at the edit history, and saw some editing by a fellow fan-site admin that strikes me as fairly petty. I'm going to recuse myself from any changes - either to his sites or mine. I don't want to get dragged down. But if one (or more!) neutral editors could step in, take a look, and make their own decisions, I would appreciate it. The diffs are most easily seen via [[http://paragonwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Paragon_Wiki%3ACommunity_Portal&diff=24305&oldid=22342]] | ||
I could be overreacting, but I'd like another set of eyes. [[User:Sapph|Sapph]] 15:01, 8 June 2007 (EDT) | I could be overreacting, but I'd like another set of eyes. [[User:Sapph|Sapph]] 15:01, 8 June 2007 (EDT) | ||
== Utility Warning == | |||
Two questions about the utility warning. First: while the original EULA clearly forbid map packs, the new one is not so clear cut. Check out the logic at [http://www.vidiotmaps.com/faq.php?q=eula | http://www.vidiotmaps.com/faq.php?q=eula]. I think the case for legal map packs is a good one. | |||
Two: Neither I, nor anyone I have talked to, nor anyone who has responded to an RFC in my fora has ever even heard of a one-day ban for map use. Is there anyone who has first-hand knowledge of the ban (ie, was in the ban), and was directly told it was for map use? | |||
Revision as of 19:36, 8 June 2007
<.< is it okay to put any links on here? as in, sg ones?
RFC
I was looking at the edit history, and saw some editing by a fellow fan-site admin that strikes me as fairly petty. I'm going to recuse myself from any changes - either to his sites or mine. I don't want to get dragged down. But if one (or more!) neutral editors could step in, take a look, and make their own decisions, I would appreciate it. The diffs are most easily seen via [[1]]
I could be overreacting, but I'd like another set of eyes. Sapph 15:01, 8 June 2007 (EDT)
Utility Warning
Two questions about the utility warning. First: while the original EULA clearly forbid map packs, the new one is not so clear cut. Check out the logic at | http://www.vidiotmaps.com/faq.php?q=eula. I think the case for legal map packs is a good one.
Two: Neither I, nor anyone I have talked to, nor anyone who has responded to an RFC in my fora has ever even heard of a one-day ban for map use. Is there anyone who has first-hand knowledge of the ban (ie, was in the ban), and was directly told it was for map use?