Template talk:Navbox Pet Commands: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Konoko (historical) |
imported>Eabrace (historical) No edit summary |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
== To detail or not to detail == | == To detail or not to detail == | ||
I personally like having the slash command parameters in the Navbox so that I can see them at a glance. But the parameters add noise that gets distracting and is hard to find a command at a glance. Which format should we use for the slash command navbox templates? --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 23:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC) | I personally like having the slash command parameters in the Navbox so that I can see them at a glance. But the parameters add noise that gets distracting and is hard to find a command at a glance. Which format should we use for the slash command navbox templates? --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 23:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I'd have to say I like the more detailed one, myself. The links make it relatively easy to pick out each command. Just my two cents. --[[User:Eabrace|Eabrace]] 00:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:44, 9 December 2008
To detail or not to detail
I personally like having the slash command parameters in the Navbox so that I can see them at a glance. But the parameters add noise that gets distracting and is hard to find a command at a glance. Which format should we use for the slash command navbox templates? --Konoko 23:39, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'd have to say I like the more detailed one, myself. The links make it relatively easy to pick out each command. Just my two cents. --Eabrace 00:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)