Talk:Council/Ascendants: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Thirty7 (historical) (Created page with "== Subpage? == Is there any reason why sub-groups, like these, other Council sub-groups and the various Arachnos sub-groups should be subpages to the main pages? For example: Co...") |
imported>Thirty7 (historical) m (→Subpage?: wording edit) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Subpage? == | == Subpage? == | ||
Is there any reason why sub-groups, like these, other Council sub-groups and the various Arachnos sub-groups | Is there any reason why sub-groups, like these, other Council sub-groups and the various Arachnos sub-groups shouldn't be subpages to the main pages? For example: Council/Ascendants or Arachnos/Fortunatas. The only reason I am suggesting that is so that on the top of each of these pages there would be that "breadcrumb" link back to the main page and it would also be more visually obvious that these groups are connected directly to the main group, and in fact aren't seperate entities at all. Perhaps this would be too little benefit for the work involved, but the thought occurred to me so I figured there was no harm in asking. —[[User:Thirty7|Thirty7]] [[File:Talk-Icon.jpg|link=User talk:Thirty7]] 18:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:59, 22 December 2011
Subpage?
Is there any reason why sub-groups, like these, other Council sub-groups and the various Arachnos sub-groups shouldn't be subpages to the main pages? For example: Council/Ascendants or Arachnos/Fortunatas. The only reason I am suggesting that is so that on the top of each of these pages there would be that "breadcrumb" link back to the main page and it would also be more visually obvious that these groups are connected directly to the main group, and in fact aren't seperate entities at all. Perhaps this would be too little benefit for the work involved, but the thought occurred to me so I figured there was no harm in asking. —Thirty7 
18:59, 22 December 2011 (UTC)