Talk:Issue 13: Difference between revisions
imported>TonyV (historical) |
imported>TonyV (historical) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
--[[User:TonyV|TonyV]] 04:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | --[[User:TonyV|TonyV]] 04:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Just to clarify, even if you don't have some official citation or source but you ''do'' have some compelling reason to think that this might be added to Issue 13, at least put a note on this talk page indicating that. But please, don't use "players have been asking for it" as a justification. If that were the standard, these upcoming issue pages would be megabytes. I'm just mainly looking for something--anything--to indicate that there's some rationale and people aren't just making stuff up. --[[User:TonyV|TonyV]] 04:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:36, 17 June 2008
Rularuu Weapons
Are we sure about it being until 13? I thought the quote was more along the lines of "no ties to the story of 12" SaintNicster 02:49, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
o,o yups, thats what the quote said. I had to read it twice myself. still, its a bit off, and we have no pics or anything yet anyway (much less the badge list to unlock them), so it can't hurt to just wait a week or so and then move it over once we do have more. --Sleepy Kitty 03:49, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Rampant Speculation
I have removed the following points from the Possible Content section:
- New Zones, Costumes, Inventions, Powersets, and/or Enemy groups (this is way too vague, and will apply to every issue)
- The return of the 5th Column as a major enemy group (the 5th have returned, and I've never seen anything indicating that their return would be as a "major" enemy group)
- Base Improvements (citation?)
- A Water Zone (citation?)
- The Coming Storm revealed (citation?)
- The addition of Blue Steel as a combative NPC (now you're just making shtuff up)
All of these bullet points strike me as being idle speculation with no basis in anything the developers or community reps have indicated might be in Issue 13.
Please remember that the Paragon Wiki is a source of information that has at least some official relevance, and we really want to avoid turning pages on upcoming issues into player wishlists. If you have a source for any of the above, by all means move it back onto the main page and cite it. If not, please avoid pulling stuff out of the air.
--TonyV 04:21, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- Just to clarify, even if you don't have some official citation or source but you do have some compelling reason to think that this might be added to Issue 13, at least put a note on this talk page indicating that. But please, don't use "players have been asking for it" as a justification. If that were the standard, these upcoming issue pages would be megabytes. I'm just mainly looking for something--anything--to indicate that there's some rationale and people aren't just making stuff up. --TonyV 04:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC)