Talk:SSOOCS: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Konoko (historical) mNo edit summary |
imported>GreyDog (historical) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should link to Inventions. What is the correct format for this?--[[User:GreyDog|GreyDog]] 16:00, 25 May 2007 (EDT) | Should link to Inventions. What is the correct format for this?--[[User:GreyDog|GreyDog]] 16:00, 25 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
:What, <nowiki>[[Inventions]]</nowiki>? Or are you talking about putting a blurb in this and other related articles (Wisdom, Skills, Legends systems) about how they've basically been blended into Inventions. --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 16:49, 25 May 2007 (EDT) | :What, <nowiki>[[Inventions]]</nowiki>? Or are you talking about putting a blurb in this and other related articles (Wisdom, Skills, Legends systems) about how they've basically been blended into Inventions. --[[User:Konoko|Konoko]] 16:49, 25 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
::The second one, I think. Maybe we put the HISTORICAL template on all of those and a bullet in the NOTES section that these have been abandoned/combined into INVENTIONS.--[[User:GreyDog|GreyDog]] 16:52, 25 May 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 20:52, 25 May 2007
Should link to Inventions. What is the correct format for this?--GreyDog 16:00, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
- What, [[Inventions]]? Or are you talking about putting a blurb in this and other related articles (Wisdom, Skills, Legends systems) about how they've basically been blended into Inventions. --Konoko 16:49, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
- The second one, I think. Maybe we put the HISTORICAL template on all of those and a bullet in the NOTES section that these have been abandoned/combined into INVENTIONS.--GreyDog 16:52, 25 May 2007 (EDT)