Template:Citation needed: Difference between revisions
imported>SpaceNut (historical) m (fixed Wikipedia links) |
imported>SpaceNut (historical) m (→Verification: missed a couple) |
||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
==== Verification ==== | ==== Verification ==== | ||
* {{tl|verify credibility}}, flag a source as possibly being [[WP:RS|unreliable]] and/or [[WP:V|unverifiable]] | * {{tl|verify credibility}}, flag a source as possibly being [[Wikipedia:WP:RS|unreliable]] and/or [[Wikipedia:WP:V|unverifiable]] | ||
* {{tl|verify source}}, request that someone verify the cited source backs up the material in the passage | * {{tl|verify source}}, request that someone verify the cited source backs up the material in the passage | ||
* {{tl|failed verification}}, source was checked, and did not contain the cited material | * {{tl|failed verification}}, source was checked, and did not contain the cited material |
Revision as of 22:57, 24 January 2010
[Citation needed]
Purpose
This template is used in articles to identify sentences or short passages which are incomplete without an inline citation. It produces the following appearance:
- This sentence needs an inline citation.[Citation needed]
Editors frequently use this template to "tag" material which they see as questionable or weak, but not obviously invalid. The tag serves as a request for a specific inline citation. Addition of such a citation will help verification of the material.
Contraindications
If you have the time and ability to find an authoritative reference, please do so. Then add the citation yourself, or correct the article text. After all, the ultimate goal is not to merely identify problems, but fix them.
Many editors object to what they perceive as overuse of this tag, particularly in what is known as "drive-by" tagging, which is applying the tag without attempting to address the issues at all. Consider whether adding this tag in an article is the best approach before using it, and use it judiciously.
This template is intended for specific passages which need citation. For articles or sections which have significant material lacking sources (rather than just specific short passages), there are other, more appropriate templates, such as {{unreferenced}}.
Technical details
This is an in-line template. Place the template immediately after the material in question, as one would do with a footnote. For example:
This sentence needs an inline citation.{{fact}}
The name {{fact}}
may make more sense if you visualize a question-mark after it: Fact?
The text "citation needed" will be linked to Wikipedia:Citation needed, which explains to readers what the tag means.
This template is a self-reference, and so is part of the Wikipedia project, rather than the encyclopedic content.
Categorisation
Adding this template to an article will place the article into one of a family of categories identifying "Articles with unsourced statements". To find all such articles, see Category:All articles with unsourced statements.
The articles will categorize by month, by a bot, using the date parameter to the template. These categories are subcategories of Category:Articles with unsourced statements.
To find articles which have significant material lacking sources (rather than just specific passages), see Category:Articles lacking sources.
Date parameter
This template allows an optional date parameter that records when the tag was added. This helps with the categorisation of articles requiring citations.
If this template is added without the date parameter, the date parameter will be added soon after by a bot. Thus, one can just add {{fact}}
and let the bot handle the date.
Alternatively, by entering {{subst:fact-now}}
, the page will be saved with the present date already filled in.
One can also specify the date manually. For example, to date the tag in the current month, enter {{fact|date=November 2024}}
. This markup is also what will result when a bot or {{subst:fact-now}}
add the date to the template.
Alternative names
In addition to the canonical name, {{fact}}
, this template can be transcluded using either of the following alternative names:
- {{Citation needed}}
- {{cn}}
Some editors report the name "fact" is unclear/confusing to people unfamiliar with this template, and prefer these more explicit aliases.
The templates {{Citation needed}}
and {{cn}}
redirect to {{fact}}
, so transcluding them has the identical effect as transcluding the main template. There are other redirects to this template, but their use is deprecated. Cleanup bots may replace redirected templates with a direct call to {{fact}}
when performing maintenance on the article.
See also
- Wikipedia:Citing sources
- Especially: Unsourced material
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Reliable sources
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Fact and Reference Check
In-line templates
- {{citequote}}, for "actual quotations" which need citations to make them proper
- {{page number}}, request a page number for an existing citation
- {{list fact}}, request a citation of a source which justifies inclusion of a given entry in a list
- {{clarifyme}}, request clarification of wording or interpretation
Verification
- {{verify credibility}}, flag a source as possibly being unreliable and/or unverifiable
- {{verify source}}, request that someone verify the cited source backs up the material in the passage
- {{failed verification}}, source was checked, and did not contain the cited material
- {{request quote}}, request a direct quote from an inaccessible source, for verification purposes
Content
- {{dubious}}, flag something as suspected of being incorrect
- {{or}}, flag something as possibly containing original research
- {{POV-statement}}, dispute the neutrality of a passage
Article message box templates
- {{unreferenced}}, article/section has no sources/references/citations given at all
- {{refimprove}}, article/section has weak or incomplete sources/references/citations
- {{citecheck}}, article/section may have inappropriate or misinterpreted citations