Category talk:Invention Sets: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Colonel Jasmine (historical) (novices learn) |
imported>Lin Chiao Feng (historical) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Well, I figured out that this is a Category, not an article, but still as a novice user I found it difficult to find this page again later. --[[User:Colonel Jasmine|Colonel Jasmine]] 02:54, 30 April 2007 (PDT) | Well, I figured out that this is a Category, not an article, but still as a novice user I found it difficult to find this page again later. --[[User:Colonel Jasmine|Colonel Jasmine]] 02:54, 30 April 2007 (PDT) | ||
: One of the oddball things about Wiki is that if you put a <nowiki>[[Category:foo]]</nowiki> link in, instead of putting in a link to the category page, it puts the page into the category. This makes it hard to have pages that link to category pages. I have no idea if writing it as <nowiki>[[:Category:foo]]</nowiki> will do things differently. --[[User:Lin Chiao Feng|Lin Chiao Feng]] 07:01, 30 April 2007 (PDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:01, 30 April 2007
I would like to see this page renamed to "Invention Set Index" or something similar, indicating its index-like nature. It's a great page but it's not an article, and I'd like to further disambiguate it from the Invention Origin Enhancement Sets article. Anyone else have an opinion on the matter? --Colonel Jasmine 02:51, 30 April 2007 (PDT)
novices learn
Well, I figured out that this is a Category, not an article, but still as a novice user I found it difficult to find this page again later. --Colonel Jasmine 02:54, 30 April 2007 (PDT)
- One of the oddball things about Wiki is that if you put a [[Category:foo]] link in, instead of putting in a link to the category page, it puts the page into the category. This makes it hard to have pages that link to category pages. I have no idea if writing it as [[:Category:foo]] will do things differently. --Lin Chiao Feng 07:01, 30 April 2007 (PDT)