View source for Talk:Supergroup Emblem

Do we need a seperate article for Emblem Images? Recommend the images article be combined into this one. --[[User:GreyDog|GreyDog]] 17:05, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

:The SG images link is to a category, not an article. And while we're at it, what the heck is up with some of those images? Some of them are blank (like "Fingerprint"), and some of them aren't even SG emblems (like "Emblem Jewel" options.) That page needs cleaned up. [[User:Martavius|Martavius]] 19:47, 17 May 2007 (EDT)

:As said above, the other article is a category--they don't show up in searches by default. Plus it needs some cleanup. -- [[User:Sekoia|Sekoia]] 08:57, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

:Okay, I'm confused then. What's the difference between an Article and a Category?  (n00b alert!) --[[User:GreyDog|GreyDog]] 11:52, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

A category lists articles or lists images or lists files. Like Sekoia said, they don't show up in searches by default. An article is what most of a wiki is, with the info and stuff, and is what you get when you search. You link to an article [[Supergroup Emblem|like so]] and a category [[:Category:Super Group Emblem Images|like so]]. [[User:Martavius|Martavius]] 14:11, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

: o.o had a look at the stuff in the cat.. err.. well, first of all, some of those are costume options for the chest and not emblems (jewel for instance, and the reason it looks funky is that its the component images, not the complete thing.. thats why there are several there.). Also, on the Fingerprint one, its there, you can't see it though without a non white background since the print itself is white, and very skinny. --[[User:Sleepykitty|Sleepy Kitty]] 17:02, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

I have to agree.  The list is good, but they're not all options for the group emblem.  I know my SG would like to use the symbol for Omega, but that isn't available at this point.  Maybe it would be in a future "Issue", but not right now. --[[User:BattlerockX|BattlerockX]]